Similarities and Differences of Hilter and Napolean

Founder and leader of the Nazi party, who many describe to be the most insane and trouble causing man in the history of the entire world. Adolf Hitler’s goal was to make Germany the strongest country in the world, which he did, along with most of Europe. His armies of over sixteen million men were standing by his side the whole way. Although he had a large group of followers, he also had an even larger group of people who were against him. Adolf felt that if he did not remove all of the Jews from the face of the earth, he would have been seen as a failure, so he tried, and he tried, and he tried. But in the end, he failed. This then led to him believing that he was a failure, which then led to him shooting himself in the mouth.†¦show more content†¦Besides the fact that he conquered Moscow, the Russians did not surrender. Instead, they burned the city before the French got there, so the shelter and supplies that Napoleon was counting on were destroyed. So, his army h ad to retreat back to Germany, while being chased and hunted by the Russians. The whole Russian campaign ended up as a complete failure. He lost almost all of his 500,000 men that he had started with. In 1810, he divorced Josephine and married the daughter of the Austrian Emperor, Marie-Louise, in a last attempt to improve relations. Upon his return to France, the Prussians, Russians, Swedish, and the British started the War of Liberation against him. His army was soon forced over the Rhine at the Battle of Leipzig. However, the allied armies did not accept the plan and they demanded that the brother of Louis XVI, Louis XVIII, be put on the throne. Napoleon was sent to rule the Island of Elba in 1813 with the British Navy guarding the Island. But, in 1815, he returned to Paris and his old armies quickly gathered around him, already sick of the new king. The allies were threatening to invade France again since they heard of the return of Napoleon, so he quickly organized a new army a nd marched them into Belgium to meet the British and Prussian armies. In Ligny, he defeated the Prussians and then marched to Waterloo to meet the British under Wellington. At first, he was doing well in the battle.

I Have Abide By The Uncg Academic Honor Code Essay

I have abide by the UNCG Academic Honor Code in writing this paper Greta Scalco, RNInterview of a Nurse Leader A leader can be defined as a person who has the ability to influence people to achieve certain goals. According to Marcus Huston (2015), it is very important to understand that a job title does not make a person a leader. Only a person’s behavior can tell us if he/she holds leadership role (p 34). To be a leader, a person must be able to be in front of everybody, taking risks, inspiring other’s actions, advocating for others. The next interview will underline how the manager on medical-surgical floor is working to achieve a better quality of work on her unit, and also, how she is leading her staff in maintaining a safety environment for the patients and for the staff, too. It is well known that teamwork brings the most satisfying results. Therefore, in order to implement a plan, a leader must have a united and dedicated team. The interview started with a very common question., to what extent this manager, as a nurse leader e nsures nursing staff on the unit support patient centered care of individuals and families whose values differ from their own. If there are some barriers to ensure nursing staff support patient centered care, and how she as a nurse leader can improve patient centered care in her unit. Her plan seems to be very interesting and can be used as a model for other units. She said: â€Å"We maintain the same expectations and standard of care

Crime and Society free essay sample

Bessant amp; Watts, (2007) post-modernist theory states that the mass media is â€Å"simply an enormous factory for manufacturing illusions. †(p. 447) In other words that the audience are essentially mindless drones that act as sponges and will soak up all fallacies and untruths. (Bessant amp; watts, 2007) This theory suggests that people are unlikely to think critically about what they see and hear because what is presented is generally just accepted at face value as truth and the manipulation to great. An example of this manipulation is seen in Germany’s propaganda and in particular Hitler’s speeches, in which â€Å"His propaganda experts created an environment in which both the individual and the group lost their identities and were fused into a homogeneous mass. †(Levyatan 2009). Hitler’s aim was to create a â€Å"robot-like following†(levyatan 2009), an audience that wouldn’t think critically or question the mass genocide to come. This was mostly accomplished through careful manipulation of the German public through well thought out techniques designed to illicit a certain response. Levyatan 2009) For example Hitler’s speeches could start out quite dull creating a sense of boredom designed to create complacency only to conclude with a strong conclusion, dramatisation and a sense of immediacy. Chibnall discusses similar techniques that are used by the mass media. Listed below are eight ‘new values’ used often when reporting crime. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) The first four are immediacy, dramatisation, novelty and titillation. These techniques aim to control and entertain the public. The media’s focuses on reporting mostly exciting, sex and crime driven stories. Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) They choose to report them as everyday and individual events that have just happened rather than explaining any historical or social contexts. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) As a result the audience can believe that this kind of crime is very common and often doesn’t understand the reason or the underlying relationships between victim and offender. The last four are personalisation, simplification, conventionalism and structured access. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012)These techniques are designed to really connect with the listeners and viewers. The media chooses to write stories about people its audience can already personally relate too such as high profile individuals. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) Then takes complicated and unfamiliar facts, simplifies it and puts it into familiar contexts that the general overall public can understand. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) Then finally, cites state officials and police officers to give their story credibility. (Hayes amp; Prenzler, 2012) Unfortunately the result is that the public is less likely to question what they are being shown or have heard and mass media consumption leads to exposure to violence which is inflated and simplified. Below are two case studies that explore the relationship between the media and fear of crime. The first is Curtis’s study of ‘Jack the Ripper and the London Press (2001) in which he explores how powerful the written word could be in London and its ability to drum fear into the masses. (Marsh amp; Melville, 2008) He believed the press coverage during the police search for ‘the Ripper’ was responsible for the public’s growing fear. (Marsh amp; Melville, 2008) That the newspapers exaggerated and built on the stereotypical views of the people and how They viewed the east end of London. Marsh and Melville (2008) said it was see as â€Å"a crime and disease ridden, uncivilized jungle. †(p. 3) Curtis’s study indicates that there is definitely a possible link between the media and its fear of crime. However, a survey done in Trinidad shows a distinct lack of relationship between media and crime. (chadee amp; ditton, 2005) The survey consisted of asking the public different questions about crime. It looked at their views and fears of crime and compared it to the amount and different types of media they were exposed too. chadee amp; ditton, 2005) The results concluded that there did not appear to be an obvious relationship between what the people had seen and heard about crime and their views and feelings on the matter. (chadee amp; ditton, 2005) The variation in results would suggest that other variables are at play, perhaps the cross-cultural differences or social context needed to be explored . The Trinidad study concluded that perhaps people in this cul ture viewed the media unreliable, or the news reports were unmemorable and that the frequency of the reports was unreliable. chadee amp; ditton, 2005) The overall evidence; Hitler’s propaganda campaign and the mass hysteria encouraged by the London press explored by Curtis would seem to support the idea that consumers really are susceptible to the media’s influence. It would suggest that listeners and viewers are indeed incapable of seeing through the subtle and effective techniques harnessed by the media. However, the survey done in Trinidad; accessing the lack of relationship between the media and fear of crime clearly indicates that this is not always the case. This suggests that outside social factors need to be taken into account such as a person’s media consumption, how the media is viewed within that culture and the outside social influences on the individual, such as family and friends. To conclude, the fact then remains that despite the overall evidence because other variables have to be accounted for at all it would seem to refute the post-modernist concepts that the public are unable to reflect on what they see and hear within the media.